Forest Update, April 2011

Forest Update, April 2011

1. Lockheed Emergency Exemptions
2. Expanded bank failure on SDSF Haul Road
3. Highland Way road failure - Can SDSF log? 
4. Sacramento - A Day in the Capitol
5. Biomass Conference - UC Davis
6. New THP - Pescadero Creek, SCL/SCR
7. Salmonid Restoration Federation April Newsletter
8. "The Big Thirst", by Charles Fishman

1. Lockheed Emergency Exemptions

Big Creek Lumber continues to reap benefits from the Lockheed Fire. Now that they have logged much of their own fire-affected forests under Emergency Exemptions (no THP required), as well as Cal Poly's and Cemex's , they have begun logging Lockheed lands. Turns out that Big Creek Lumber owns the timber rights on Lockheed's property.

They submitted 3 Emergency Exemptions in February and March, 2011 encompassing 381 acres.  The logging operations were conducted during the winter period, with hauling to take place in March or early April once the roads dried out. They were unable to complete operations on all three exemptions prior to the commencement of the marbled murrelet nesting season cutoff. I believe DFG gave them a brief extension for hauling through a small segment of murrelet buffer zone.

I am informed that there is a substantial amount of old growth redwoods on the Lockheed property, though Big Creek has apparently stayed out of the large stands. All three harvests are in the upper Scott Creek Watershed.

2. Expanded bank failure on SDSF Haul Road

In previous Updates, we have gone on at length about the bank failure along the main access/haul road into the Soquel Demonstration State Forest. The failure originally occurred in 2006 and SDSF received an award to repair the bank. However, the funding was returned and the failure left as is. This winter, heavy and continuous rains swelled Soquel Creek and caused additional damage to the bank and roadbed. Twice. Hopefully, SDSF will complete the repair, now estimated to cost about $250,000, before next winter. 

We surmise that the road may no longer be safe for loaded log trucks. In that eventuality, the plan proposed cutting a new, short WLPZ road segment to easily connect to the much longer road leading out toward Highland Way. However, hauling in that direction may also now be up in the air. See below.

3. Highland Way road failure - Can SDSF log? 

After seven years of attempting to get an approved THP on the Soquel Demonstration State Forest, SDSF now has two such plans. The Rim THP is slated to start in May and haul logs out along Highland Way. However, recent storms sent slides onto this precarious county road, as well as undermined sections of the roadway.  The road has been reduced to a single lane in at least one location. As of this writing, it is uncertain whether or not the road will be passable to log trucks this season.

4. Sacramento - A Day in the Capitol

We recently attended Sierra Day in the Capitol and had a  meeting with Secretary of Resources, John Laird. 

Sierra Day was sponsored by The Sierra Nevada Conservancy and others and billed as an education day for legislators. Interestingly, the Executive Officer of the Sierra Nevada Conservancy is Jim Branham. Mr. Branham used to be spokesman for Pacific Lumber. Hmm, might explain why the Conservancy is not working with Stop Clearcutting California and others to end clearcutting on SPI lands within the Conservancy. That would be about 1 million acres. The Sierra Day literature noted that, "sustainable (sic) managed forests provide important habitat, help clean our air and water, and aid in the natural storage of water by protecting the snowpack." Also, "Sierra Nevada forests provide up to 50% of California's annual timber yield."

We brought to Secretary Laird's attention (as if he did not know) the need to find more funding for DFG timber review, as well as discussed a number of other details of importance regarding California's natural resources.

5. Biomass Conference - UC Davis

In conjunction with our trip to the Capitol, we attended a day-long Biomass Conference in Davis. Speakers at the Conference included experts from the California Air Resources Board, the CA Public Utilities Commission, the US EPA, US Forest Service, Center for Biological Diversity, UC Berkeley, CAL FIRE, and other notables. 

Much of the information was scary to someone interested in protecting our forested watersheds and environment in general. For instance: the lack of regulation by the EPA of biomass boiler emissions, other than carbon. Or some accounting methodologies that were presented for carbon sequestration from clearcutting, which never addressed carbon amounts if the land were not logged, or selectively logged instead. A professor from Ohio State discussed the possibility/probability of needing to import lumber from other countries, should biomass production be taken to heart.

6. New THP - Pescadero Creek, SCL/SCR

A new  164 acre THP 3 miles north of the town of Aromas has been submitted by Bill Vaughn for property located in Santa Cruz and Santa Clara Counties in the Pescadero Creek Watershed. The plan goes to First Review April 21.

ftp://thp.fire.ca.gov/THPLibrary/North_Coast_Region/THPs2011/1-11-030SCL-SCR/

7. Salmonid Restoration Federation April Newsletter

Items of interest from the latest SRF Newsletter:

  1. North Coast Fish Passage Design and Engineering Workshop
  2. 6th Annual Spring-run Chinook Symposium
  3. 14th Annual Coho Confab
  4. Farms and Salmon Summit
  5. SRF Annual Board Election Reminder
  6. SRF Conference Evaluation Forms
  7. SRF 2011 Conference Proceedings Available Online
  8. 2011 Restorationist of the Year Award
  9. CA Recreational Salmon Season Opens
   The Nature Conservancy Hiring Salmon Project Director

8. "The Big Thirst", by Charles Fishman

An interesting read on water. We use more of it than we think.

"For the past 100 years, the developed world has enjoyed a cheap, safe, and abundant water supply, but Fishman (The Wal-Mart Effect) warns that everything about water is about to change—how we use it, how we share it, and how we value it. 

In an engrossing, globe-trotting narrative, he introduces the reader to people already grappling with water shortages—Patricia Mulroy, Las Vegas's no-nonsense water czar known as the best water manager in the country; the inhabitants of a neighborhood in Delhi who line up twice a day for water they must carry home. 

Since water cannot be created or destroyed, the challenge we face is not so much about water scarcity but rather how we can use it more equitably and protect it—the meaning of "clean" has a wholly new connotation in an era when we can pollute water in new ways with residues of medicine and plastics. 

Fishman notes that some of the most innovative ways of conserving water are coming from big businesses, including IBM, which has cut the water use in its microchip production 27% in the past eight years. A comprehensive, remarkably readable panorama of our dependence on—and responsibilities to—a priceless resource. (Apr.)"  From Publisher's Weekly

"[A] lively and invaluable assessment of the current politics, economics, and culture of water. Lyrical in his descriptions of the beauty and wonder of water, Fishman is rigorous when explaining that the water we have now is all the water we will ever have."—Booklist (starred review)

"A wide-ranging look at that most precious of goods, water, and a world in which it is a subject of constant crisis...A timely warning." —Kirkus


Jodi Frediani
Forestry Consultant
Santa Cruz Group
Ventana Chapter, Sierra Club
ph/fax 831-426-1697
JodiFredi@aol.com

Jodi Frediani
Director
Central Coast Forest Watch
ph/fax 831-426-1697
JodiFredi@aol.com

URGENT: Email by March 25th: Stop Carbon Credits for Clearcuts

PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT AND SEND THE SUGGESTED EMAIL BELOW, OR DRAFT YOUR OWN VERSION. WE MUST STOP CA FROM GIVING CARBON CREDITS FOR CLEARCUT LOGGING. THIS IS MADNESS.

THANKS,
JODI

-----Original Message-----
From: Karen Maki <Karenmaki@earthlink.net>
To: 
Sent: Thu, Mar 24, 2011 3:53 pm
Subject: [lpfpc] Please Email by March 25th to Stop Credits from being awarded for Clearcuts

 

Dear Friend,
California leads the nation in addressing climate change through the state’s cap and trade program. Unfortunately, the state is about to incentivize clearcutting through their climate change program.
We need you to take action to keep this from happening by emailing the Climate Action Reseve today at policy@climateactionreserve.org. There is a sample comment at the end of this email.
Through California’s cap and trade program, projects that protect forests and sequester carbon will receive carbon credits. Shockingly, timber companies are trying to get credits for clearcutting our forests! 
If clearcutting continues to be allowed under California’s cap and trade system, it will compromise our ability to fight climate change and it will destroy our forests. Clearcutting d estroys rich native forests which are home to wildlife and native plants and turns them into tree plantations.
The Climate Action Reserve, which will supervise the cap and trade program, is asking for input from the public. They’ve already received several scientific white papers that challenge the premise that clearcutting practices will positively impact carbon sequestration. 
Please join us in calling for California to remove clearcutting from their climate change programs by emailing policy@climateactionreserve.org by March 25th. There is a sample comment below.
Thank you for your help to stop clearcutting and climate change.
Sincerely,
Sarah Matsumoto
Sierra Club

Sample Comment to the Climate Action Reserve

Dear Decision Maker,
Thank you for your work to create forest project protocols that protect forests and sequester carbon. I am writing to ask you to include the scientific information from your “White Papers” in order to accurately assess carbon emissions and, based on that information, to reconsider allowing clearcut projects in the forest project protocol.
The recent Climate Action Reserve White Papers contain data revealing carbon emissions related to clearcutting not being accounted for under current rules. Based on information in these papers, the Climate Action Reserve must remove clearcutting from the allowable methods for carbon offset projects.
Science, including your recent series of white papers, demonstrates that clear cut projects do not optimally sequester carbon. Please consider the carbon in soil and lying dead wood which together are a large percentage of the carbon in a forest.
We should adopt only programs that will most reliably assure actual seque stration and avoid those, such as clearcuts, that ignore carbon impacts of entire components of the activity seeking to be called an “offset.”  We should particularly avoid subsidizing clearcuts because it is extremely difficult to assure additionality with them, and also because they pose significant environmental risks.
California’s working timberlands are important for the ecological services they provide, not only for nature, habitat and wildlife, but for people too.  Our forests are the lungs of the earth that purify our air.  Our forests control sedimentation and temperature of the waters we drink, and on which our salmon depend for reproduction.  Even aged, clearcut forests are less resilient, more prone to fire and disease, and provide less diversity of habitat for the species on which nature and Californians depend.
Please protect the integrity of the climate program and resilien cy of California’s forests by: a) eliminating from the offset program clearcutting of our forests as a way of sequestering carbon; b) adding provisions to assure that forest projects DO NOT result in the conversion of naturally managed (uneven aged forests) into clearcut plantations (even aged forests).

Sincerely,
Your name

Forest Update, March 2011

Forest Update, March 2011

1. Fern Gulch THP 1-09-096 SCR: Approved
2. New bank failure on SDSF Haul Road
3. New Cemex THP 1-11-011 SCR - Little Creek 
4. SMO Butano THP 1-10-080 SMO: Recirculated
5. 3-acre Amendment to THP 1-09-087 SCR: Recirculated
6. ALERT: Proposal to increase NTMP acreage to 7,500 or 10,000 acres!
7. April 5, Santa Cruz City Water Department HCP Presentation
8. Forest Protocol White Papers - Comments Due Mar 25
9. ASP Rule 916.9 Section V Technical Advisory Committee Survey

1. Fern Gulch THP 1-09-096 SCR: Approved
The Fern Gulch THP 1-09-096 SCR for the Soquel Demonstration State Forest was finally approved by CAL FIRE on March 16, 2011. First submitted in 2004, the 201-acre THP has undergone major revision but still contains troubling provisions. The plan will 1) not be putting in a permanent bridge across Soquel Creeek for future access, 2) will be constructing miles of road within the plan area, sometimes on existing landslides and slopes so steep crib logs need to be installed to cantilever the roadbed out, because cutting into the bank is not acceptable.
This plan and the 158-acre Rim THP have been approved for SDSF in the past six months. We anticipate that both will be operated on this summer. The Rim THP operations will be conducted by Sierra Pacific Industries. The Fern Gulch THP still must go out to bid. The 360-acres from these two plans will add to the hundreds of acres harvested in recent years in the Soquel Creek Watershed by Redwood Empire and the Olive Springs Quarry.
Endangered and nearly extirpated coho salmon were found in Soquel Creek in 2008. Any increased sediment inputs will continue to impair habitat. A significant lack of large wood in the stream is also a contributing factor. It now appears that NOAA's pleading may have been successful and while no large wood project was incorporated into the plan, SDSF is contemplating and planning on installing some large wood into the creek.
CAL FIRE's Official Response can be found as 20110316_1-09-096SCR_OR.pdf at this link: 
ftp://thp.fire.ca.gov/THPLibrary/North_Coast_Region/THPs2009/1-09-096SCR/

2. New bank failure on SDSF Access/haul Road.
It's never fun to have to say "I told you so", but CAL FIRE has been remiss in repairing a significant bank failure along the main access road to the Soquel Demonstration State Forest. The original failure occurred in 2006 and SDSF had a grant to do a repair in 2007. Unfortunately, the grant was returned and SDSF has wrangled with agencies ever since complaining that they do not have funds to do the repair.
Well, late February 2011, an additional 20' along the outer edge of Hihn's Mill Road failed taking out the upper 10 feet of the creek bank. According to the CGS March 10 memo, "an average of about 24 inches of bank recession occurred as a result of scour by high flows in Soquel Creek. It appears that the recent bank failure involved up to about 15 cubic yards of material."
During review of THP 1-09-096 SCR (Fern Gulch) it was impossible to get agreement that the repair would be conducted prior to this winter or even during the life of the plan. Now the CGS geologist for the Plan (to differentiate from the CGS geologist representing the Review Team) has made the following recommendation: "[I]t would be prudent to implement mitigation measures this operating season, prior to next winter's storms." CGS also notes that "active scour is occurring at the toe of the bank at the failure area due to the past winter period storm events. Continued removal of the creek channel alluvium exposed at the bank toe from storm flows may cause continued bank sloughing during, and after, large storm events."
Apparently, SDSF is now taking this road failure seriously. According to information received earlier today, it appears that SDSF is proposing a project description for the bank repair that would turn it into a restoration project, including installation of root wads and other habitat improvement elements. This is good news! The repair will require dewatering Soquel Creek and cannot commence until sometime this summer. It appears that this repair could cost in the ballpark of a quarter million dollars. Let's hope the money materializes.
Of course, the bank failure may have worsened with the recent storms this past weekend.

3. New Cemex THP 1-11-011 SCR - Little Creek
A new THP for 211-acres along the North Fork of the Little Creek Watershed on lands owned by Cemex was accepted for filing by CAL FIRE on February 17, 2011. Little Creek is part of the Scotts Creek Watershed. Coho salmon, steelhead trout and California red-legged frogs are present in the watershed. No winter operations are proposed. Murrelet habitat may exist within the plan area and/or along the haul route.
The Cemex forest covers 8,210 acres and divided into 13 units. One unit is planned for commercial harvest each year. The whole plan area was burned at moderate burn severity during the 2009 Lockheed Fire.
"Aggradation behind debris jams is also prevalent. Debris check-dams that were burned out during the Lockheed Fire have caused reorganization of the bedload in some locations and therefore increased sediment transport. Near-stream mass wasting is moderate to high."
Cemex has recently harvested under a number of Emergency Exemptions as a result of the Lockheed Fire.
ftp://thp.fire.ca.gov/THPLibrary/North_Coast_Region/THPs2011/1-11-011SCR/

4. SMO Butano THP 1-10-080 SMO: Recirculated
This 260-acre THP was submitted by Big Creek Lumber and is located 6.2 miles east-southeast of the town of Pescadero. The North Fork of Butano Creek flows along portions of the plan boundary. Public Comment closes March 21.
ftp://thp.fire.ca.gov/THPLibrary/North_Coast_Region/THPs2010/1-10-080SMO/

5. 3-acre Amendment to THP 1-09-087 SCR: Recirculated
This is an amendment to add 3-acres and 800' of skid trail to a 12 acre THP 1400 feet upstream from the San Lorenzo River. Public Comment closes April 18. Gary Paul is the RPF. Bushnell the property owner.
ftp://thp.fire.ca.gov/THPLibrary/North_Coast_Region/THPs2009/1-09-087SCR/Amendments/Major%20Am%20%231/

6. Proposal to increase NTMP acreage to 7,500 or 10,000 acres
Once again, the timber industry, with support from some environmentalist along California's North Coast are proposing legislation to increase the allowable acreage for Non-industrial Timber Management plan ownership from 2500 acres to 7500 acres. (Maybe more.) These in-perpetuity harvest permits were established for small non-industrial (do not own mills) timberland owners. 
This would allow for NTMPs on lands of Redtree Properties, Cemex and San Jose Water Company among others in the Southern Sub-district.  Enviros welcome the inclusion of larger acreages up north, as this would theoretically incentivize landowners to give up clearcutting in exchange for a simplified regulatory process. Since clearcutting is prohibited for NTMPs and in the Southern Sub-district we would get nothing in exchange. Instead, we would get more plans that are good forever without any additional opportunity for public input, once approved.
More info to follow soon.

7. April 5, Santa Cruz City Water Department HCP Presentation

Santa Cruz City Council (meeting to be held in City Council Chambers) will have a special meeting on April 5 at 4pm to hear the Water Department's presentation of its proposed Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). The HCP is an effort to secure a federal permit for "take" of endangered and threatened species, including coho and steelhead salmon. The big question mark is how much water the National Marine Fisheries Service will require the City to leave in area streams for fish habitat. (from SC Desal Alternatives)

8. Forest Protocol White Papers - comment deadline Mar 25
Forest Protocol White Papers
When Version 3.0 of the Climate Action Reserve’s Forest Project Protocol (FPP) was adopted by the Reserve’s Board of Directors on September 1, 2009 the Board instructed Reserve staff to continue to explore a series of issues related to forest carbon accounting and forest management practices. To this end, the Reserve has commissioned a series of white papers to examine these issues in more depth. The white papers cover the following topics:
  1. 1. Accounting for carbon in soils affected by forest carbon projects
  2. 2. Accounting for carbon in lying dead wood
  3. 3. Effects on forest carbon of even-aged management and alternative silvicultural activities
  4. 4. Evaluation of sustainable forestry certification programs and criteria
  5. 5. Assessment of forest project eligibility on federal lands
The first four of these papers are now completed and available for download below.
  1. Accounting for Carbon in Soils
  2. Carbon Accounting and Management of Lying Dead Wood
  3. Carbon Dynamics Associated with Even-Aged Management

9. ASP Rule 916.9 Section V Technical Advisory Committee Survey (from CAL FIRE)
CAL FIRE’s Anadromous Salmonid Protection Rule Section V Technical Advisory Committee (VTAC) requests your assistance with helping us implement the Anadromous Salmonid Protection Rule 916.9 Section V Pilot Projects.  
Please take a few minutes and complete the online survey found at the following website:  http://calfirevtac.weebly.com/

Your thoughts and comments will help us set priorities in the months ahead and will help us frame the issues and approach we take as we develop guidance for this innovative approach to riparian forest management.  A brief introductory video (optional), as well as background information, is provided on this website. 

We would greatly appreciate your survey response at your earliest convenience. Survey responses received before March 29th will be discussed at our next VTAC meeting.   

Thank you very much for taking the time to help us implement the Anadromous Salmonid Protection Rule 916.9 Section V Pilot Projects.

Mike Liquori, Sound Watershed Consulting (VTAC Chair)
  1. Pete Cafferata, CAL FIRE (VTAC Lead Staff


Jodi Frediani
Forestry Consultant
Santa Cruz Group
Ventana Chapter, Sierra Club
ph/fax 831-426-1697
JodiFredi@aol.com

Jodi Frediani
Director
Central Coast Forest Watch
ph/fax 831-426-1697
JodiFredi@aol.com

Cloning and planting old growth redwoods - Ancient Tree Archive

-----Original Message-----
From: rick parfitt <rick@parfitt.info>
To: Jodi Frediani <jodifredi@aol.com>
Sent: Mon, Mar 14, 2011 9:06 pm
Subject: (no subject)

j

-------- Original Message --------

Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:12:25 -0700
From: Elizabeth Sharkey <sharkiyah@gmail.com>
To: rick parfitt <rick@parfitt.info>


Group seeks forest restoration to cleanse planet

Meryl Marsh AP – In this September 2010 photo provided by the Archangel Ancient Tree Archive, group member Meryl Marsh …
By JOHN FLESHER, AP Environmental Writer John Flesher, Ap Environmental Writer Sun Mar 13, 2:14 pm ET
COPEMISH, Mich. – Redwoods and sequoias towering majestically over California's northern coast. Oaks up to 1,000 years old nestled in a secluded corner of Ireland. The legendary cedars of Lebanon.

They are among the most iconic trees on Earth, remnants of once-vast populations decimated by logging, development, pollution and disease. A nonprofit organization called Archangel Ancient Tree Archive is rushing to collect their genetic material and replant clones in an audacious plan to restore the world's ancient forests and put them to work cleansing the environment and absorbing carbon dioxide, the greenhouse gas largely responsible for global warming.

"In our infinite wisdom, we've destroyed 98 percent of the old growth forests that kept nature in balance for thousands of years," said David Milarch, the group's co-founder. "That's what we intend to put back."

Milarch, a tree nursery operator from the northern Michigan village of Copemish, and sons Jared and Jake have been producing genetic copies of ancient trees since the 1990s. They've now joined with Elk Rapids businesswoman Leslie Lee and a team of researchers to establish Archangel Archive, which has a staff of 17 and an indoor tree research and production complex.

Its mission: Clone the oldest and largest individuals within the world's most ecologically valuable tree species, and persuade people to buy and plant millions of copies — on factory grounds and college campuses; along riverbanks and city streets; in forests, farms, parks and back yards.
"The number of these ancient survivors that go in the ground will be the ultimate measure of our success," said Lee, who donated several million dollars to get the project off the ground and serves as board chairwoman. The group hopes donations and tree sales will raise enough money to keep it going.

Scientific opinion varies on whether trees that survive for centuries have superior genes, like champion race horses, or simply have been in the right places at the right times to avoid fires, diseases and other misfortunes. But Archangel Archive is a true believer in the super-tree idea. The group has tracked down and cloned some of the biggest and oldest of more than 60 species and is developing inventories.

The plan is eventually to produce copies of 200 varieties that are considered crucial. The trees preserve ecosystem diversity, soak up toxins from the ground and atmosphere, store carbon while emitting precious oxygen, and provide ingredients for medicines. Rebuilding forests with champion clones could "buy time for humanity" by mitigating centuries of environmental abuse, said Diana Beresford-Kroeger, an Ontario scientist who studies the roles of trees in protecting the environment.

California's coastal redwoods and giant sequoias, the world's largest trees, are best suited for sequestering carbon because of their size, rapid growth and durability, said Bill Libby, a retired University of California at Berkeley tree geneticist and consultant to Archangel Archive. The longer a tree lives, the longer its carbon remains bottled up instead of reaching the atmosphere.

"They grow like crazy," Libby said. "I have a clone of what used to be the world's tallest redwood tree in my back yard. It's still a baby, only 30 years old. It's already taller than anything around it, probably 80 to 100 feet."

Archangel Archive crew members have taken cuttings from redwoods and sequoias between 2,000 and 3,000 years old. Among them: the Stagg tree, ranked the world's sixth-largest sequoia by the U.S. Forest Service; and the Waterfall sequoia, considered the widest tree on Earth at ground level — 155 feet around.

Three dozen coastal redwood clones and nine of the giant sequoias have taken root in the Copemish facility and another in Monterey, Calif., David Milarch said. The group also has successfully cloned sprouts from stumps of a dozen redwoods that were felled years ago, including one 35 feet in diameter.

The group uses several processes to develop clones. One is micropropagation, in which branch tips less than an inch long are planted for weeks in baby food jars containing gel-like mixtures of vitamins, fertilizers and hormones and placed on shelves under artificial lights. Eventually they are moved to pots of soil. Another method is to place tips up to 8 inches long in soil blends and grow them in mist chambers.

Terry Root, a Stanford University climate change expert, said giant tree clones could help fight global warming if large numbers are planted where conditions favor their long-term survival. "You can't put a redwood or giant sequoia just anywhere," she said. Location is also an issue in cities. Big, shady trees could lower home energy costs in the summer but could shed limbs and cause damage to houses if planted too close.

Finding genetically superior trees has been challenging, but group leaders acknowledge their biggest hurdle may be selling the public on the urgency of restoring the world's ancient forests.

David Milarch said he was aghast to learn that vast tree plantations were being cultivated in Ireland — not with native oaks, but with pine and cypress imports from California that would grow quickly and be harvested instead of helping cleanse and cool the planet as native champions would do.

"It makes no sense to plant monocultures of exotic species while the last of your giant native trees are in danger of blinking off the earth," he said.
___
Online:
Archangel Ancient Tree Archive: http://www.ancienttreearchive.org

Jodi Frediani
Forestry Consultant
Santa Cruz Group
Ventana Chapter, Sierra Club
ph/fax 831-426-1697
JodiFredi@aol.com

Jodi Frediani
Director
Central Coast Forest Watch
ph/fax 831-426-1697
JodiFredi@aol.com

BREAKING NEWS: Judge rules against Bohemian Club!!!

What great news! Judge Rene Chouteau ruled against the Bohemian Club and Cal Fire on the Bohemian Grove NTMP. The issue that led to success of the suit brought against the Bohos and CAL FIRE, and argued by Sierra Club lawyer Paul Carroll, was the failure to consider even one feasible alternative. The case was heard March 4th in a hearing in Santa Rosa Superior Court with 3 hours of arguments presented by both sides.

As a result of the Judge's ruling, the Bohemian Club will have to start over with a new NTMP (or THP) in order to continue logging their significant forested holdings. John Hooper, fourth generation Bohemian Club Member turned opponent who resigned to found Save The Bohemian Grove (www.bohemiangrovelogging.org) was instrumental in organizing the strong opposition to the poorly crafted NTMP. Additional issues that were exposed by opponents of the plan included early failure to disclose groves of old growth redwoods and Douglas Fir, too many acres to qualify for an NTMP, faulty use of a 'Conservation Easement' to remove some of the excess acreage from the logging plan (but not from the Grove ownership) in an attempt to meet the 2500 acre timberland ownership limit for NTMPs, inadequate protection of old growth, and improper veracity of carbon sequestering requirements.

The now defunct NTMP would have increased logging from 800,000 board feet to 1.7 million board feet over a 50 year period. Sierra Club (including involvement from the Santa Cruz Group), Forests Unlimited, Central Coast Forest Watch and others joined forces to help expose the host of problems with the Grove's in-perpetuity timber harvest proposal. A 'flyover acreage analysis' similar to the one conducted on behalf of NAIL that got the San Jose Water Company NTMP ultimately denied by CAL FIRE kept the Boho's on the run, trying to figure out ways to meet the 2500 acre NTMP timberland limit.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, every living President since Herbert Hoover is believed to have been a Bohemian Club member. Other notables of the males-only club include Henry Kissinger, George H.W. Bush, Colin Powell, Donald Rumsfeld, Kenneth Starr and other members of the power elite.

The Judge's ruling is not yet available. More information can be found at: http://www.bohemiangrovelogging.org/

Jodi Frediani
Forestry Consultant
Santa Cruz Group
Ventana Chapter, Sierra Club
ph/fax 831-426-1697
JodiFredi@aol.com

Jodi Frediani
Director
Central Coast Forest Watch
ph/fax 831-426-1697
JodiFredi@aol.com

Register for Feb 24 Sierra Dialog Sessions

-----Original Message-----
From: Vivian Parker <info@sierraforestlegacy.org>
To: Vivian Parker <info@sierraforestlegacy.org>
Sent: Mon, Feb 7, 2011 7:20 pm
Subject: Register for Feb 24 Sierra Dialog Sessions

Dear friends and supporters of the Sierra Nevada,  

The U.S. Forest Service is convening Session 2 of the Sierra Cascades Dialog Sessions on Feb. 24th in Sacramento – see below.

Or call to register:  (916) 278-4433 or (800) 858-7743
Registration fee:  $20 (includes lunch)

Hope to see you there.

Vivian Parker
(for) Sierra Forest Legacy

Image001

Jodi Frediani
Forestry Consultant
Santa Cruz Group
Ventana Chapter, Sierra Club
ph/fax 831-426-1697
JodiFredi@aol.com

Jodi Frediani
Director
Central Coast Forest Watch
ph/fax 831-426-1697
JodiFredi@aol.com

Next Steps on GE Salmon

I don't usually forward petitions, but this one seems critically important.  Apologies to those of you already receiving these alerts. Jodi

-----Original Message-----
From: Natalie Nava, Food & Water Watch <fwwatch@mail.democracyinaction.org>
To: jodifredi@aol.com
Sent: Fri, Feb 4, 2011 2:18 pm
Subject: Next Steps on GE Salmon

Food & Water Watch: Advocating for our right to safe, affordable, healthy food and water.


February 4, 2011

Dear Jodi,

We've stopped GE Salmon so far. Let's keep it up!
Letters and calls from California have poured in to the FDA, asking them not to approve genetically engineered salmon. Your hard work has paid off so far: Senators Boxer and Feinstein both publicly opposed GE salmon and the FDA has still not made a decision on whether or not to approve this Frankenfish. We aren't waiting for them to make up their minds!

This week, Senator Mark Begich of Alaska introduced a bill (S. 230) to ban GE Salmon. Can you ask California's Senators to stand with consumers and the environment again and co-sponsor the bill?

With your help, Food & Water Watch delivered over 90,000 comments against the approval of GE salmon last year. These fish pose serious risks to human health, wild fish populations, and the environment. After pressure from California activists, Senators Boxer and Feinstein both publicly opposed GE salmon by writing letters to the FDA and President Obama. Now we need them to put the brakes on GE salmon for good.

Will you ask Senators Boxer and Feinstein to help California take the lead by co-sponsoring a bill to ban Frankenfish?

Approving the first genetically engineered animal for human consumption without proper scientific review opens the floodgates for other GE animals to land on our plates. We need to send a strong message that we don't want GE salmon.

Ask California's Senators to support consumers and the environment by co-sponsoring the bill:

http://action.foodandwaterwatch.org/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=5582

Thanks for taking action,

Natalie Nava
Outreach Organizer
Food & Water Watch
nnava(at)fwwatch(dot)org


Food & Water Watch is a nonprofit consumer organization that works to ensure clean water and safe food. We challenge the corporate control and abuse of our food and water resources by empowering people to take action and by transforming the public consciousness about what we eat and drink.

To stop receiving these email updates, click here.

empowered by Salsa

Forest Update, February 2011

Forest Update, February 2011

1. Board of Forestry Members Depart
2. Feb 22: SDSF Fern Gulch THP Close of Comment
3. New Cemex THP, No. Fork Little Creek
4. NMFS rejects Petition to Delist Coho, Proposes Range Extension
5. Industry pushes for larger NTMPs, again!
6. Proposed Legislation re DFG Management of wildlife resources 
7. EPIC seeks Full-Time Program Director
8. Felton FLOW Hosting Showing of "Water Makes Money" Feb 8
9. A New Future for Jackson State Forest

1. Board of Forestry Members Depart
Industry Board member Tom Walz' term is up as is Industry member, Lloyd Bradshaw. Both have declined to apply for additional terms. Public member Doug Piirto, whose term also expires this year, is no longer available to serve, and Public member Gary Nakamura's term is also up, so Governor Brown will be making filling the four seats. 
2. Feb 22: SDSF Fern Gulch THP 1-09-096 SCR Close of Comment
After six plus years, the Fern Gulch THP nears the finish line, at least for approval. Originally submitted in 2004, the plan hit a number of road-blocks. Some had to do with the THP document itself, but other problems arose after trees were illegally felled within the plan area.
The THP was resubmitted in 2009 and has undergone extensive review since them. This plan may hold the record for number of pre-harvest inspections and most review team members present. Although the San Jose Water Company NTMP  gives it a run for the money.
NMFS and DFG have had problems with the wet-ford crossing of Soquel Creek used by SDSF staff, the lack of a permanent bridge proposal and the on-going problem of a bank failure along the main haul road and access road adjacent to Soquel Creek.  DFG has gotten agreement that the wet-ford crossing will not be used except in the case of emergency during the life of the plan. 
NMFS has gotten an agreement that large wood will be included as part of the bank failure repair. The THP requires that plans for a permanent fix must be prepared for the bank failure and approved by DFG before the commencement of operations. (Actually, the plan does not specify that the fix must be permanent, but DFG is insistent that they will not approve anything else.) However, there is no final date given for fixing the problem. We think this is a serious failure, but CAL FIRE is hiding behind the economic woes of the state. Never mind that SDSF had received a federal grant award in 2007 to repair the road/bank failure, but returned the award because it would have required the state to pay out of pocket and then get reimbursed. Shame on them!
Close of comment for this 500 + page plan is February 22. The re-circulated documents can be found at:
ftp://thp.fire.ca.gov/THPLibrary/North_Coast_Region/THPs2009/1-09-096SCR/
3. New Cemex THP 1-11-011 SCR
Cemex has submitted a new 211 acre THP for the North Fork of Little Creek in the Scotts Creek Watershed. Cemex had agreed not to log in this area while Cal Poly conducted their baseline monitoring studies downstream on Little Creek. Joe Culver is the RPF and First Review is slated for February 3, 2011. 
ftp://thp.fire.ca.gov/THPLibrary/North_Coast_Region/THPs2011/1-11-011SCR/
4. NMFS rejects Petition to Delist Coho, Proposes Range Extension
A petition to delist coho south of San Francisco was submitted by Big Creek Lumber and accepted by NMFS "on April 2, 2010, triggering a formal review of the petition and a status review of the listed ESU. A biological review team (BRT) was convened to assist in reviewing the petition and the status of the species. Based upon our review of the petitioned action and the status of the species, we conclude that the petitioned action is not warranted and that coho salmon populations south of San Francisco Bay are part of the endangered CCC coho salmon ESU."

"We further conclude that the southern boundary of the CCC coho ESU should be extended southward from its current boundary at the San Lorenzo River to include Soquel and Aptos Creeks in Santa Cruz County, California, and are proposing this change in the ESU boundary."  From the Federal Register 50 CFR Part 224 [Docket No. 100323162–0595–02]

Contact: Jim Milbury FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
562-980-4006 February 3, 2011
SANTA CRUZ, Calif. – NOAA’s Fisheries Service has today filed with the Federal Register a proposal to extend the southern range of federally protected Central California Coast Coho salmon from San Lorenzo River to Aptos Creek. The new information supporting an expansion of the range was found while reviewing a public petition to reduce the animal’s southern boundary.

The current boundary for the evolutionary significant unit (ESU) of Central California
Coast Coho salmon extends from Punta Gorda in northern California south to and including the San Lorenzo River near Santa Cruz, Calif. This ESU was listed as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act on October 31, 1996, and reclassified as an endangered species on June 28, 2005.

On April 2, 2010, NOAA Fisheries Service accepted a petition from a private landowner
to review whether coho salmon found in streams south of San Francisco Bay should be taken off the federal list of endangered species. In July, a biological review team was formed by scientists and fishery experts from NOAA, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Forest Service to analyze the request.

The biological review team concluded that coho south of San Francisco Bay are part of
the listed population and that the range should be increased approximately seven miles south to include Soquel and Aptos Creeks. Some of the reasons for including these waterways include the recent observation and genetic material of coho salmon in Soquel Creek, and the similarity of habitat and watershed conditions that support the spawning and rearing of coho salmon in both watersheds.

NOAA’s Fisheries Service is requesting public comment for the proposed range
extension. Specific information on Soquel and Aptos Creeks would be especially helpful, including: recent or historical knowledge, including photographs, illustrating the presence and run size of coho; information on the current suitability of habitat to support salmon spawning, rearing and migration; biological or other relevant information

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the proposed range extension,
identified by the RIN 0648–XV30, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal http// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Facsimile (fax): 562–980–4027, Attn: Craig Wingert.
Mail: Submit written comments to the Assistant Regional Administrator, Protected Resources Division, Attn: Craig Wingert, Southwest Region, National Marine Fisheries Service, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 5200, Long Beach, CA 90802–4213.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted to http:// www.regulations.gov without change.

5.  Industry pushes for larger NTMPs, again!
Currently the law only allows Non-industrial Timber Management Plans for timberland ownerships of 2500 acres of timberland or less. Non-industrial timberland owners must not own a sawmill to qualify, hence the term 'non-industrial'. However, 'small' timberland owners of up to 15,000 acres are chomping at the bit to be allowed to utilize this vehicle for timber harvest.
While NTMPs require uneven-age management (the only silvicultural method allowed in the southern sub-district for all THPs and NTMPs) and a long-term management plan, once approved, they are good forever. They transfer with ownership.  A Notice of Operations is required to be filed each time logging commences and CAL FIRE is supposed to do inspections for each entry.
The topic of larger NTMPs is now being reviewed by the Management Committee of the Board of Forestry, but any change will require a vote of the legislature. Industry reps are hoping to get the Board of Forestry to support their efforts. Lobbying of legislators has begun.
The lack of noticing for each entry is a particular issue in our urbanized rural areas. Additionally, we've seen problems on several NTMPs, where approved mitigations have been forgotten. Institutional memory is short and NTMPs are long. How to make sure they are properly implemented is a big concern. Some environmental organizations would like to see changes in the 'beast' before agreeing to acreage increases.
The Management Committee will be attempting to gather more info on successes and failures of already approved NTMPs.
6. Proposed Legislation re DFG Management of wildlife resources
 AB 2376 will affect the future management of California’s wildlife. 

This bill would require the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to convene a committee, with membership as prescribed, to develop and submit to the Governor and Legislature, before July 1, 2012, a strategic vision for the California Department of Fish & Game and the Fish & Game Commission that addresses specified matters relating to state fish and wildlife resource management. Note; the bill includes the mandate that: 
(c) The strategic vision shall address all of the following matters:
(1) Improving and enhancing capacity of the department and the commission to fulfill their public trust responsibilities to protect and manage the state's fish and wildlife for their ecological values and for the use and benefit of the people of the state.
(2) Comprehensive biodiversity management, including conservation planning and monitoring.
(3) Sustainable ecosystem functions, including terrestrial, freshwater, and marine habitat.
(8) Reforms necessary to take on the challenges of the 21st century, including, but not necessarily limited to:
   (A) Climate change and adaptation.
The bill was penned by Assemblyman Jared Huffman from Marin County and it appears to be pretty visionary in redefining the mission for CDF&G and the Fish & Game Commission.

 Open the link below to read the entire bill.

7. EPIC seeks Full-Time Program Director
Job Description: PROGRAM DIRECTOR (FULL-TIME)
Environmental Protection Information Center (EPIC), Arcata, California
Closes: February 11, 2011
The Environmental Protection Information Center (EPIC) is a nonprofit environmental advocacy group, based in Arcata, California, that focuses on the protection and restoration of forests, watersheds, fish and wildlife in northern California. EPIC seeks an energetic, focused, and experienced conservation advocate to join our team as Program Director. The Program Director is principally responsible for developing, implementing and managing the policy agenda for EPIC’s four intersecting Program areas: Public Lands, Industrial Forest Lands, Biodiversity, and Clean Water. The Program Director is part of the EPIC leadership team, and serves as the anchor for EPIC’s conservation advocacy for the North Coast and Klamath-Siskiyou bioregions in northwestern California.
 The successful candidate will have several years experience in environmental advocacy and litigation, and substantial knowledge of both federal and California natural resource law and policy, in particular NEPA, CEQA, the Northwest Forest Plan, ESA, and clean water law. Excellent written and oral communication skills, and public speaking skills are a must. The ability to dialogue and work effectively with a variety of stakeholders is critical. Tolerance, flexibility, and humor are also vital qualities.
A complete position description is available at www.wildcalifornia.org.
To apply please send cover letter, resume, references and a writing sample by February 11th to: Search Committee at heather@wildcalifornia.org. No phone calls please.
8. Felton FLOW Hosting Showing of "Water Makes Money" Feb 8, at Satellite Telework Centers

Felton Friends of Locally Owned Water (FLOW) will host a free showing of the German documentary "Water Makes Money" on Tuesday, February 8, at 7 p.m. at Satellite Telework Centers in Felton.

Filmmakers Leslie Franke and Herdolor Lorenz featured Felton's water battle in their 2005 documentary "H20 Up for Sale." Their new film examines public-private partnerships in which communities retain ownership of their water systems, but pay private companies like French firm Veolia to operate them.

The film has been shown more than 200 times around the world and the DVD has sold more than 1,000 copies. Veolia has filed a defamation lawsuit against the film in Paris, but the judge overseeing the case is allowing showings to continue until the time of the trial.

The showing is free and any donations will be sent to the filmmakers, who financed the documentary's production cost with donations from sponsors and DVD sales. FLOW members will also provide an update on Felton's water system before the film starts.

For more information, visit http://www.feltonflow.org or call 831.234.4337.
9. A New Future for Jackson State Forest
"The advisory group appointed to make recommendations for long-term management of our public redwood forest, Jackson State Forest, has come to consensus! 
"The consensus recommendations contain the core elements of the proposals of the Campaign to Restore Jackson State Forest. This is great news for those of us who have struggled for a decade or more to bring management of our public forest into the 21st Century." - Vince Taylor
The report is available at this site:


Jodi Frediani
Forestry Consultant
Santa Cruz Group
Ventana Chapter, Sierra Club
ph/fax 831-426-1697
JodiFredi@aol.com

Jodi Frediani
Director
Central Coast Forest Watch
ph/fax 831-426-1697
JodiFredi@aol.com

Steinberg wants big review to kill regulations

20110120_HA_STEINBERG1217.JPGCalifornia Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, today said he will pursue emergency legislation forcing state agencies to review all regulations and recommend a wholesale re-writing of the state's regulatory scheme.
In an interview with The Bee Capitol Bureau, Steinberg said he'll propose "urgency legislation that directs each state agency to review its regulations, identify any duplicative, archaic or inconsistent rules."
Steinberg said lawmakers could then act on the recommendations over the next six months, perhaps expunging some rules from the 5,000-page California Code of Regulations as part of the state budget negotiations.
"To our knowledge, no one, not a previous governor, not the agencies and not the Legislature have ever compelled this sort of retrospective review to ensure that state regulations are streamlined, that they're up to date and that they're consistent with the law," Steinberg said.
The Democratic leader said his is not an effort to "weaken or undermine public health, environmental or worker safety protections," but rather to make it easier for businesses to "wade through the often difficult, complicated, duplicative bureaucracies that delay economic investment and job growth."
Steinberg, who held a Senate Democratic Caucus meeting this week with high-profile business figures, said he also wants urgency legislation that allows businesses or others to request a "consolidated and coordinated" state review process to obtain permits.
"Government needs to be more nimble," Steinberg said.
PHOTO CREDIT: Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, speaks at the Capitol Bureau. Hector Amezcua, Sacramento Bee.
The ideas emerge as Democratic leaders prepare for the Legislature to review Gov. Jerry Brown's proposal to slash $12.6 billion in government spending. They are also trying to assemble a ballot measure for June that calls for extending tax hikes they say will be needed to avoid doubling those cuts.
"We need to do a whole lot better in providing a friendlier business climate," Steinberg said, adding that Democrats need to show businesses that they "get it."
If agencies are compelled to identify duplication, Steinberg said, "we ought to identify some of the most obvious" repetitive regulations and quickly eliminate them with executive or legislative action.

Read more: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2011/01/steinberg-wants-big-review-to.html#ixzz1Bi2U67of



Jodi Frediani
Forestry Consultant
Santa Cruz Group
Ventana Chapter, Sierra Club
ph/fax 831-426-1697
JodiFredi@aol.com

Jodi Frediani
Director
Central Coast Forest Watch
ph/fax 831-426-1697
JodiFredi@aol.com